Categories: US News

Judge extends order to block Trump National Guard deployment to Portland

[ad_1]

– For todayNow you can listen to FOX news headlines!

US District Court Judge Karin Emplerutri on Sunday temporarily extended the Trump administration’s ability to send national guard troops to Portland, Oregon, saying the government failed to specify the deployment.

In an order issued on Sunday evening, Emplerut “first joins the secretary to protect the hegs from the use” Memorandum approved by the Federal and Californian in Portland.

The order will remain in effect “until this court renders its final opinion on the amendment on Friday, November 7, 2025, no later than 5 pm”

Gerrurg said the court saw “three days of evidence and controversy in a trial that ended 48 hours ago,” reviewing more than 750 exhibits, many of which were affirmative. He wrote that “the interest of justice requires that this court complete a thorough review of the exhibits and documents of the case before issuing a final decision on the merits.”

Karin J. Implerut (L) and Richard A. Herdling (R), nominated to be a US district judge for the district of Oregon and the hearing of the naming of the judgment held by the Senate Judgeral Committee on October 24, 2018, in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Trump’s team is urging an Oregon judge to end the National Guard ban

Finally, he examined the actions of the Trump Administration and found the government’s clarity lacking.

“Based on the evidence of the trial, this court does not find reliable evidence to document, the protests grew and were controlled or involved more than violent positions led by violent workers,” he wrote.

The judge also concluded that the President “Probably does not have a colorable basis” to invoke any section 12406 (3) or section 12406 (2) to Federalleise Ice’s property.

It is EmpERGURT IN CONFIRMING THE PURCHASE OF THE LOCAL LAW – The authorities who saw the information about the demonstrations – as the key to his conclusion that the demonstrations did not constitute a rebellion.

Federal agents clash with anti-ice protesters at the US Home and End building on October 12, 2025 in Portland, Oregon. (Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty Images)

A federal court hearing a case related to Trump’s authority to send National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon

“Based on the relationship of the trial that this court found credible, especially the testimony of the Portland Police Bureau Commud Chambered, working first with the crowd,” he wrote.

Gerrurg also concluded that the executive actions may have violated the limits of the law and the protection of the Constitution.

The judge wrote that “regarding patrols and the deployment of the National Guard in response to protests outside a federal building in Portland, USC § 12406 and violated the Tenth Amendment.”

Law enforcement officers guard outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) headquarters in Karin Emplerutri on Sunday to prevent US forces Donald Portland from sending any security forces to South Portland, South Portland, 2025. (Carlos Barria / Reuters)

Click here to download the FOX News app

He also added that sending troops from another country to others violates the sovereignty of the state, which he describes as “an injury to the sovereignty of Oregon under the Constitution, and the equal sovereignty of Oregon among the states.”

The judge said he expects to issue his final opinion on the settlement on Friday, November 7, 2025, at 5 PM PT. Until then, “”The Oregon State Guard may be staying dyed, but they’re not being ignored. “

[ad_2]

kimdc171