[ad_1]
Local authorities warn that more than 14,500 homes in La County subsidized, permanent housing may be forced to return to the streets or fields in the next year, mainly due to the loss of federal funds.
The predicted evictions would have erased a small reduction in the number of homeless people from 2023 and continue with demolition by local government officials and local government officials to try to mitigate the possible consequences.
“This is not a normal time and we cannot treat it as a normal time,” said Los Angeles City Councilor Nithya Raman, of the Council’s Committee on Consumer Affairs. “There’s an opportunity for the entire homeless services system that we’ve built here to fall apart.”
The estimate that more than 14,500 homes are at risk of foreclosure comes from the Los Angeles Homes Services Authority, which does not mean that many people could be affected by it.
About 3,500 of those families are at high risk because of federal funding cuts, Lahsa said, and an additional 6,000 families could lose their homes because the emergency housing voucher program is set to expire next year, four years ahead of schedule.
Between 5,000 and 7,000 additional families could have homes because their rent on permanent homes is paid by a separate federal program known as continuing care, Lahsa said.
Last month, the Trump administration announced it was scrapping a plan that would shift permanent housing and temporary options to temporary options that strengthen people with services such as mental health treatment.
It has also imposed a continuum of funding through competitive bidding and made it harder for funds to get funding if they don’t follow policies the administration wants to see, such as enforcement of the tent ban.
Last week, more than 15 states, including California, were found to have stopped that policy change.
If the lawsuit fails and the cuts go through, Lahsa’s service providers and nonprofits say they expect more people to return to homelessness because they won’t just use the extra money for the short term and use that housing for permanent residents.
Permanent housing projects are often built using other sources of government funding, including state and local dollars, that vehicle permanent housing for conversions. In addition, Lahsa said that one should have homes to move to flexible homes, so people should first lose their permanent homes to get one anyway.
“I can’t describe an entire area where we won’t see people coming home and seeing our streets bursting with people living with them,” said Stephanie Klasky-Gamer, President of La Family Hears, a non-profit shelter.
In total, Lahsa said it will take at least $323 million to recover all the money expected to be lost and keep the 14,500 homes saved.
In response to a combination of cuts, the Los Angeles city council recently urged city workers to work with the dollar to reduce the potential for reducing the number of people on the streets. The Council also asked the workers to use the program to write to the state officials and the government to “minimize the possible reduction of money.”
Earning more money can be difficult. The Republican-controlled congress – has wanted to reduce the size of the government and local and local governments face financial challenges, forcing them in recent years to make cuts and balance their budgets, including programs that fight against homes.
“I don’t think I’ve ever experienced in my years of homeless work where there was such a shortage at all levels,” said Amber Sheikh, Chair of the Lahsa Commission.
Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said there is “no way” the County can recover all of the lost money, but it is possible to retain a small proportion of the at-risk population managed by the County.
But ‘to come up with a clear plan, “said Horvath County officials first need more clarification from the federal government about their new funding needs and what kind of tools I will have.”
If thousands are forced back onto the streets, Horvath said, it would hurt those people the government is trying to help, making it harder to get them off the streets again.
And it could also hurt a broader number of LA County Voting, which last November allowed to measure a, half-asset anti-housing bill, which was an increase in leventi
Despite raising more money than ever before, the County is proposing to plan homeless programs in the coming fiscal year.
The authorities say that they are necessary because most of the additional tax that flows to the County center was recently established to build affordable housing, where the economy flows, while the economy is slow for those services as the economy has reduced and consumers spend less.
In a statement, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said that despite the “Attacks from DC” and the financial situation, “going back is not an option for LA” He promised to continue working to get people off the streets and keep them safe.
Another Avenue Leavenue Reduces the Pain from Federal cuts can still balance it, said Raman, who added to his seat on the Wa City Council in the agency, the New County Agency that receives additional income from A.
Under the voting measure, although most of the money Lacahsa received must fund the construction of new affordable houses, others can go to home prevention programs.
Ramin said he is looking into whether those dollars can be used to save at least 14,500 more at-risk households, something other officials have said they are also looking into.
“We have to be creative in meeting this critical moment,” said Ramin.
