Is Bill Gates saying we don’t need to deal with climate change?

In the past week, you may have come across articles like these: “Bill Gates bends the knee on climate change“Or”Bill Gill Gates’ Week is set on climate change – and it’s sent Eco Fanatics into a boil“Or even”Bill Gates contributes to climate change. “

But is the Microsoft co-founder and Philanthropist really saying climate change isn’t important?

The whole conversation started because of bad timing the word – Released from the gates on the same day Jamaica was swept away by a powerful storm 5 Typhoon.

It begins: “There is a doomsday view of climate change that goes like this:

“In a few decades, cataclysmic climate change will determine civilization. The evidence is all around us – The evidence is all around us – just look at all the heat waves and storms caused by global warming.

“Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong. Although climate change will have serious consequences – especially for people in the poorest countries – people will be able to survive and thrive in many parts of the world for the foreseeable future.”

The memo, posted on his Gatesnotes site ahead of the upcoming Cop30 climate conference, continues to suggest that the climate community is too focused on temperatures and emissions and is taking resources away from ways to improve human suffering such as poverty and hunger.

It sent the climate scientists to start, and the climate changers want to win.

US President Donald Trump was even sent to his social reality

On Monday, the gates told the axios Trump’s take was a “misreading of the memo.”

And that’s the right answer since he goes on to say in his memo: “It will be clear: Climate change is a very important problem. It needs to be solved with the greatest benefit because there is a stable environment that makes it easier to improve people’s lives.”

In a panel moderated by Weather coverage now Held on Tuesday by the Gates Memo, Katharine Hayhoe, a climate scientist and professor at Texas Tech University, said that the gates will not be the end of the bad people.

“I have not seen a single scientific paper that has ever stated that humanity is going to end anytime this century or even the next few centuries because of climate change.”

Zeke Haus Fanzi, research scientist at Berkeley scored agrees.

“I think you’re saying it’s not, in and of itself, an existential threat. And I don’t think it’s actually wrong there, but I also think an existential threat is a high bar for holding any problem,” he told CBC News.

Climate scientists have not said that governments and organizations should not work to help address poverty and malnutrition, saying that climate change is part of that conversation with the lives of people most at risk.

“All too many people including Bill Gates … see climate change as one bucket at the end of a long line of buckets of things that you need to fix,” Hayhoe said.

“So there’s the cold bucket, the hunger bucket, the disease bucket … the education bucket and all those other buckets. And his point is, and he’s got his condition, and he’s got his condition, and he’s got his condition, and he’s got all the money to get all the Weat and the Weat in the organization it’s aimed at.”

While Hayhoe acknowledges that the gates say climate change should work, he sees his inclusion as a challenge. Referring to his bucket list ideas, he says climate change is the hole in all those buckets; That you cannot separate climate change from anything else that would help improve the lives of those living in poverty, especially since they are the most affected by climate change.

‘Good Test’

Therefore, although, despite the pleadings, the gates say that climate change is not a threat, but he says that perhaps he should take a back seat to provide the much-needed food and money for those living in poverty. And that’s what’s so annoying about the climate sector.

But Hauswarenkule believes that the gatekeeper’s message is too biased, especially when the US, which provides billions of dollars in aid around the world, has recently reduced its funding to the United States. Other countries around the world, which provide less, also raise the World Bank’s contribution.

“I think this memo, and especially the way it’s been interpreted by many people, is seen as a kind of prioritization of other things about the climate, there is a better motive where we and promoting cold human suffering and prosperity.”

Climate change affects those living in poverty the most, experts say: More frequent droughts make it harder to grow crops; Floods have a similar effect and can increase disease outbreaks; Strong storms destroy homes and infrastructure.

Without working towards solutions that focus on mitigation and adaptation, those living in poverty will continue to be at greater risk, even if they are not responsible for the greenhouse gas emissions that cause the issue in the first place.

“We can chew gum and walk at the same time “Haus Favance said.