Expressions in plastic pollution of plastic pollution without contract

Genama – Discussions work in a national treaty to deal with glitterous pollution problems that have failed to reach a contract during the points of the Friday of the Geneva.

The nations met at the 11th day of the National National National National National Agency at the end of the agreement to eliminate the agreement to eliminate plastic pollution. They remain left out that this agreement should reduce the visual growth of plastic and set world control, which are legally carefully toxic chemicals used to make plastic. More than 1,000 delegates have participated in conversations.

UN HUB conversations have to be the last round and produce the first covenant in the plastic crisis, including the ocean. But as at the meeting at South Korea last year, they went outside the covenant.

The largest issue of speech has always been that this agreement must place CAPS for the production of new plastic or focus on such things as better shape, re-use and reuse.

Eyelo powerful and gas nations and gas and plastic industry argues with production restrictions. They want a deal focusing on better waste management and use.

Every year, the earth made more than 400 million tons of new plastic, and that would grow about 70% in 2040 without policy changes. About 100 countries want to reduce production. Many have said and important to face poisonous chemicals used to make plastic.

On Thursday was the last time scheduled conversation, but the work went on to Pred.

Luis Vayas Valdivate, Chairman of the Directoring Committee, wrote and introduced two draft of the Geneva Agreement in accordance with the ideas contained by the nations. The representatives from the 184 countries do not agree to use any basis for their discussions.

Valdivio said Friday morning as delegates also entered the Assembly Hall that there is no other verb with the recommended process.

After a three-hour session, he installed the Recycected Balle Bodge Bodge from Nairobi’s completion and the meeting was postponed, to be organized on the next day.

Representers Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and other countries said they were deeply disappointed to depart from Geneva.

The European Jessika Rosiswall said the European Union and the Municipal member expected the meeting and that the latest framework exists for their demand, is a good basis for a negotiation session.

“The earth is not only ours. We are managers to those who help. Let’s achieve that work,” he said.

The Chinese team said that fighting plastic pollution was a long race and that this temporary restoration is the first new way of getting a consensus. I urge nations to work together to provide generations to come to the blue planet without plastic pollution.

Saudi Arabia said the illegal text, and the Saudi writing and Waitors said the latest proposal took the “nations” to consider a lot of plastic prescriptions, which looks out of the agreement.

The draft, was issued at the beginning of Friday, but it was noticed that the current production levels were “a new language.

The purpose of the agreement was also arranged and to say that the Accord will be based on a broad process that faces a full life of plastic.

Science indicates what it will take to eliminate pollution and protect people’s health, said Bethany carney in Sweden at the University of Gotherburg, which includes a plastic agreement to find a plastic agreement. Science supports the full-time plastic, starting and productive life, and limiting some chemicals to ensure chemicals to ensure safe and advertised plastic.

“Science has not changed,” he said. “There is no negotiation.”

Natural expertise, waste manufacturers and leaders and many business managers have made their discussions sounded. Others use old tactics, but they left disappointed. Traditional leaders are searching for a covenant that recognizes their rights and knowledge.

A Published Report for Lancet Medical Journal The day before Geneva’s talks began to explain the plastic contamination of plastic “dangerous, growing and well-known” for at least $ 1.5 trillion per year.

Report If you compare plastic and wind and lead, she is dirty and said a plastic contamination impact It may be reduced by laws and policies.

“The plasts causing disease and death from childhood to old age and is responsible for economic losses than $ 1.5 trillion per year,” said.